The distance between Morocco and the Spanish enclave of Ceuta is fourteen kilometres at its widest point. On Wednesday, the Civil Guard and the Red Cross were pulling people out of that water at a rate of nearly a thousand in a single day. By the time Ceuta’s government leader Juan Jesús Vivas spoke to journalists, more than 1,500 migrants — adults and minors — had reached the enclave by sea in the space of a few days. “The reception centres are collapsed and saturated,” he said. Local residents reported strangers walking through the streets still dripping wet, some with swimming fins in their hands. At least four people are believed to have died. Around twenty are missing. In Morocco, families are appealing for information about sons and brothers who entered the water and did not come back.
Spanish Interior Ministry figures show 2,826 irregular arrivals in Ceuta between the start of this year and July 15 — a 149 percent increase on the same period in 2025. Land crossings over the same period rose by 215 percent. These numbers predate this week’s surge. They describe a trend that has been building for months and that the events of the past few days have rendered impossible to ignore.
The immediate political explanation on offer in Madrid and Ceuta centres on a Spanish Supreme Court ruling issued earlier this month. The court found that migrants arriving by sea cannot be immediately pushed back to Morocco without due process — unlike those who cross by land, by climbing the border fence, who remain subject to summary return. Vivas has said, directly, that this ruling triggered the surge. It is a convenient explanation because it is partially true and because it puts the blame on the judiciary rather than on the structural conditions that have been generating crossings for decades. Omar Naji, president of the Moroccan Association of Human Rights in Eastern Morocco, was sceptical. Most Moroccans, he said, would not have known about a Supreme Court ruling. He noted that the timing of the crossings reminded him more of the May 2021 crisis, when Moroccan border controls appeared to loosen following a diplomatic rupture between Madrid and Rabat over Spain’s decision to allow the leader of the Polisario Front to receive hospital treatment in the country.
The 2021 precedent is worth dwelling on. In May of that year, more than 8,000 people entered Ceuta in the space of two days after Moroccan authorities appeared to step back from the border. Spain deployed troops. Prime Minister Sánchez flew to Ceuta and described the situation as a serious crisis for Spain and for Europe. Two thousand seven hundred people were returned to Morocco by midday on the second day. Within weeks, the diplomatic row had been resolved through concessions on the Western Sahara question. Morocco resumed its function as Europe’s southern border guard. The crisis passed.
What did not pass was the underlying logic it revealed: that Morocco’s cooperation on migration is not a fixed diplomatic arrangement but a variable that Rabat adjusts according to bilateral relations. Morocco is a demanding partner that knows how to lobby for its interests, and it has demonstrated repeatedly that migration can function as leverage. The EU should, analysts have long argued, develop alternative plans of action in case of an unbridgeable divergence of interests. It has not done so in any meaningful way. The relationship with Rabat has instead deepened: France’s Macron visited in 2024 to propose a strategic migration partnership, explicitly supporting Moroccan sovereignty over Western Sahara in return. Spain has been doing the same calculus for years. The result is that the most effective mechanism Europe has for managing crossings at Ceuta and Melilla is not its own border infrastructure — it is the willingness of a neighbouring state to do the controlling on its behalf.
This week, that willingness appears to have lapsed. The reasons are unclear and disputed. What is clear is that fourteen kilometres of water and the legal question of whether people who traverse it by swimming can be returned immediately have combined, in the space of a few days, to overwhelm a Spanish enclave of 84,000 people and produce images that will circulate across European media for days.
Those images arrive at a particularly uncomfortable moment for European migration policy. Six weeks ago, the European Parliament voted 418 to 218 to pass a new Returns Regulation, permitting member states to transfer refused asylum applicants to third-country “return hubs” and extending administrative detention to a maximum of 24 months. The vote was preceded by far-right MEPs chanting “send them back” in the chamber, and left-wing MEPs responding with “shame on you.” The political theatre obscured what was actually happening: the mainstream centre of European politics has moved substantially toward positions on migration enforcement that would, a decade ago, have been associated only with its far right. The Returns Regulation is the legislative expression of that shift.
What it cannot do — what no legislative instrument can do — is alter the economic geography that sits on the other side of fourteen kilometres of Mediterranean water. Nearly 70 percent of Moroccans under 30 express a desire to emigrate, according to the Arab Barometer. Morocco ranks 23rd out of 177 countries in the human flight and brain drain index, despite having neither a war nor a significant political crisis. Between 2000 and 2023, its GDP grew by almost 90 percent. The Gini coefficient remains at 46 percent. Social inequality is high, public education underfunded, and the upward mobility available to a young person from the Rif or the working-class suburbs of Casablanca is structurally constrained in ways that aggregate growth statistics do not capture.
The people swimming toward Ceuta this week are not, in the main, fleeing persecution. They are making a rational calculation about the comparative value of their lives in two different economic systems separated by a short stretch of water that is also the most dramatic inequality boundary in the world. The EU’s GDP per capita is roughly nine times Morocco’s. Spain’s minimum wage is approximately twenty times the Moroccan equivalent. These figures are not unfamiliar to a young Moroccan with a smartphone. The swimming crossings have been gaining momentum on TikTok for years, with videos that, by the nature of the medium, show arrival and celebration rather than the sixty bodies spotted floating in these waters over the past twelve months.
The European response to this dynamic has been evolving in a direction that is increasingly candid about its own logic. The Pact on Migration and Asylum, now in early implementation, the Returns Regulation just passed, the expanded detention powers, the emphasis on “partnership” with transit countries — all of these are instruments of deterrence and management, not instruments of resolution. They are designed to make crossing harder, arriving less legally secure, and remaining more difficult. They do not address the conditions that generate the crossings.
The Washington Institute analysis of the 2021 crisis argued for greater EU investment in Moroccan economic development and a serious rethink of the Common Agricultural Policy’s impact on Moroccan farmers’ competitiveness. That argument has been made regularly for twenty years. It has not produced a material change in the structural relationship between Europe and its southern neighbours, partly because it requires European agricultural interests to accept constraints they have consistently resisted, and partly because the political economy of migration management makes deterrence cheaper in the short term than development in the long term.
What Ceuta demonstrates, this week as it has demonstrated before, is that the short term keeps arriving. The enclave’s government has described the situation as “extremely serious” and called on Spain’s central government to take urgent action. On Wednesday alone, nearly 1,000 people were rescued from the water. The reception centre is over capacity. People are sleeping outside. The Civil Guard is working through the night.
The European Parliament’s new Returns Regulation will not process these arrivals faster. The Morocco partnership will be renegotiated, quietly, at some point in the coming weeks or months, and border controls on the Moroccan side will tighten again. The images will fade from the front pages. And the conditions that sent 1,500 people into fourteen kilometres of open water in a few days — the inequality, the blocked legal channels, the social media amplification, the decades-old migration culture in which going to Europe is a known and attempted thing — will remain exactly as they were, waiting for the next window of opportunity, the next diplomatic friction, the next good night for swimming.
Europe has been managing this for thirty years. It has not yet decided whether it wants to resolve it.
Subscribe to EuroLuminant for independent European journalism.
